Strategic legal partnership for growth-stage companies, agencies, and established enterprises — the kind of counsel that operates at the level your business demands, without the overhead of an in-house legal department.
The Corporate Division is RLG's most comprehensive practice — serving companies that require outside general counsel with the sophistication to match the complexity of what they're building.
Shareholder and operating agreements, board resolutions and minutes, officer authority documentation, annual corporate compliance, and multi-entity structure management. Governance is not administrative overhead — it is legal infrastructure.
Master service agreements, SaaS and licensing contracts, vendor and supplier agreements, enterprise client contracts, and distribution agreements. The contracts your business operates under determine the legal exposure it carries.
Due diligence support, letter of intent review, asset and stock purchase agreements, post-close integration, and exit strategy advisory. A business built to last should also be built to transfer — on the best possible terms.
Trademark portfolio strategy and maintenance, trade secret program development, copyright asset management, IP licensing and monetization strategy, and IP due diligence for transactions. IP is often the most valuable asset on the balance sheet.
Executive employment agreements, equity incentive plan review, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, HR policy development, and senior leadership documentation. At the executive level, employment law is not an HR function — it is a legal one.
Data privacy compliance (CCPA, GDPR), industry-specific regulatory requirements, multi-state operational compliance, and government contract guidance. Regulatory exposure grows with business scale — and it is rarely linear.
At the enterprise level, legal gaps have proportionally larger consequences. These patterns are consistent — and consistently expensive.
The corporate veil — the legal separation between the entity and its owners — requires ongoing maintenance. Annual meetings, board resolutions, updated operating agreements, and current ownership records are not formalities. They are the evidence that the entity was treated as a legitimate separate legal person. Companies that skip these requirements for months or years create exposure that only becomes visible when it is too late to remedy it: in litigation, in acquisition due diligence, or in a regulatory review.
Corporate veil piercing allows courts to hold owners personally liable for business debts and judgments. In an acquisition, inadequate corporate records slow or kill deals and give buyers leverage to reprice. The remediation work required after years of neglect is orders of magnitude more expensive than the maintenance would have been.
Growth-stage companies frequently execute master service agreements, enterprise client contracts, and vendor agreements under timeline pressure — often with legal review treated as a formality or omitted entirely. Enterprise contracts contain indemnification clauses, limitation of liability provisions, IP ownership terms, audit rights, and termination provisions that are not standard across industries. What a company agrees to in these contracts defines its legal exposure for the life of the relationship.
Indemnification provisions in enterprise contracts have exposed companies to liabilities that were multiples of the contract value. Unlimited liability clauses, unfavorable IP ownership terms, and one-sided termination rights that were not negotiated at execution become binding for the full contract term — and sometimes beyond it.
Many established companies have significant intellectual property — brand names, product designs, software, proprietary processes, trade secrets — that has never been formally protected or inventoried. This gap becomes consequential in three scenarios: a competitor infringes and there is no registered IP to enforce; a transaction requires IP due diligence and the company cannot demonstrate clear ownership; or a key employee departs and the company's trade secrets walk out without legal protection.
IP portfolios are increasingly central to enterprise valuation. An acquisition that reveals unregistered, unprotected, or unclear IP ownership gives buyers immediate repricing leverage. Enforcement of IP rights without prior registration significantly limits available remedies and monetary recovery.
Employment classification errors at the senior level carry compounding consequences. Executives operating under contractor arrangements they have not chosen, leadership roles without proper employment agreements, and equity arrangements without vesting documentation are common in fast-growing companies. The pattern is consistent: the company moves quickly, documentation is deferred, and by the time disputes arise the informal understanding and the legal reality are far apart.
Executive employment disputes are among the most costly commercial litigation an enterprise faces — not just in legal fees, but in management distraction, reputational exposure, and the disclosure of internal business information that litigation produces. The cost of getting it right at the outset is a fraction of the cost of resolving it after the fact.
Enterprises that have not built legal infrastructure for eventual transfer, acquisition, or leadership succession routinely encounter problems when circumstances force the issue. Shareholder agreements without buyout provisions, businesses without succession plans for key officers, and ownership structures that have never been documented with the precision an acquisition requires are common — and become apparent only when a transaction opportunity or a crisis demands immediate clarity.
Acquisition readiness is not something that can be assembled in the weeks before a deal closes. Buyers at the enterprise level conduct thorough due diligence, and the gaps they find are rarely overlooked — they become the basis for valuation adjustments, earnout structures, or deal termination.
Companies at growth stage frequently use a combination of ad hoc specialist engagement, DIY agreements, and deferred legal decisions — because the cost of consistent outside counsel has been weighed against other priorities. The pattern that results is predictable: legal issues that surface reactively, at higher cost and with fewer options than proactive management would have produced. The question is not whether a company of meaningful scale needs outside legal counsel. It is whether that counsel is engaged before or after the problem that makes it unavoidable.
The cost differential between proactive outside GC engagement and reactive legal work is significant at every stage — and grows as the business does. Every major transaction, dispute, or regulatory inquiry that a company reaches without proper legal infrastructure is harder and more expensive to resolve than it would have been with it.
Corporate Counsel on Call is RLG's most selective retainer program — outside general counsel for companies that require legal thinking at the executive level. Five member maximum. Application required.
This is not legal support. It is a strategic legal partnership embedded in how your company operates — a dedicated outside GC who understands your business, your industry, and your objectives well enough to function as a board-level resource.
View Program Details →Outside GC access, contract review and drafting, compliance advisory, and corporate governance support for growth-stage companies.
Apply for DetailsExpanded outside GC, M&A advisory, employment law support, IP portfolio management, and priority same-day response.
Apply for DetailsComprehensive outside GC with unlimited strategic advisory, dedicated relationship partner, board-level consultation, and transaction lead support.
Apply for Details